Re: Coding fuel

From: Stephen Judd (judd_at_merle.acns.nwu.edu)
Date: 1998-07-01 22:00:31

Well, first and foremost, I'd like to thank all for the responses so far;
People who understand the virtue of 64 coding surely have a better
appreciation for life's small indulgences.  And, not only has this given 
me some new beers to try sometime, it has also given me some good filler 
material for C=Hacking :).

> > Those were our favorite beers in Greece (note: the Greeks are not famous
> > for good beer ;-)
> Drinking beer in Greece is just like drinking beer in France or
> drinking wine in the Czech republic: Not done :)

The only place I've been to in Europe is France, and I agree: wonderful wine
and horrible beer :).

Someone earlier described Amstel and Heinekin beer as being "the worst".  
Sir, I must disagree.  There are far worse beers.  For example, there are 
always various college guys around who brew their own beer; one of those 
is definitely the worst beer I've had.

I also had a "malt whiskey beer" while in France -- I can't say that I
found it very appealing.

But, sad but true, there are a number of American beers which are just
plain bad.  Bad bad bad bad "good God what are you THINKING man!?" bad.
We're talking the Spectrum ZX, the Bionic Granny, the MS-DOS of beers.

> > Here in the States, beer isn't considered coding fuel.  The three drinks

Although I in general agree -- better to keep the mind and wits sharp for
coding -- I must say that occasionally having a beer and chips with
an afternoon coding session can be quite enjoyable (like having chips
and a beer while watching a ballgame).

> > of choice are Jolt, Coke and Mt Dew (Jolt and Mt. Dew have more than 80mg
> > of caffiene in the U.S., not always so overseas).
>
> heh. Jolt is on the so-called "Opium-list" over here. The organisation of
> the TakeOver'98 party (yeah, I know.. No X part, so it sucks anyway) had
> some problems with the fact that they kinda sold Jolt at that party..

Very interesting.  Jolt really is a drug delivery device (much like
certain beers around here).  But I've never heard of it being banned :).
(I can't have any of them, personally -- caffeine totally hoses me).

> > am an American, I detest crappy American beer like Budweiser and Miller.
> 
> Budweiser should be good, since it's supposed to be the US version of
> Budvar...

And there is an interesting story.  Apparently, some years back,
Budweiser wanted to build a brewery in Czech/Slovakia -- and the
government wouldn't let them!  The refusal was to the effect that
"We don't have a whole lot of stuff here, but the one thing we do 
better than anyone else is make beer, and we don't think a crappy
beer factory is in the national interest."

Regarding American beer, Budweiser is nothing like Budvar.  The
popular American beers (Bud, Miller, etc.) are basically pretty
wimpy.  Their main virtue is that you can drink a lot of it at
once -- they are cheap, and don't taste horrible after a bottle
or two.  For example, you don't have a beer and watch the football
game -- you have a six-pack and watch the football game.  And you
can still walk afterwards.

Although they're not very tasty, they also don't taste _bad_.  Just
kind-of light and watery.  (Light beer, which is also popular, is
_really_ light and watery, and I'd rather just drink water).  Since
I personally like to just enjoy an occasional beer, with a meal or 
as a treat (or a Saturday afternoon coding session :), I don't go 
for the cheapies.  (Although it should be noted that some food,
like brats or pizza, goes pretty well with cheap beer).

In recent years micro-brews have become more popular.  These are
generally more comparable to the European beers.  Some popular
examples are Sam Adams, Pete's Wicked Ale, Rogue, etc.  Often they 
will brew their formulas in the vats of bigger brewing companies.
Here in the Wisconsin area there are quite a lot of mid-sized
breweries, and quite a lot of reasonably priced beer.  There are 
also "brewpubs" nowadays -- restaurants with brewing facilities 
on the premesis.

These other beers generally cost quite a lot more than the cheap 
American "macro-brews". How cheap is cheap?  Generally a 24-pack of 
cheap beer costs around $10.  That's about $0.40 per can.  A micro or 
imported beer is generally around $6-$7 for a six-pack.  (And a bottle
of good Czech beer is $2 per bottle).  The beer I like to extoll the 
virtues of -- Old Style -- is basically a mid-range beer costing around 
$7 for a 12-pack of bottles.  The flavor of the fancier beers is certainly 
better, but it sure isn't $7 better.

Note that some beers are _really_ cheap-ass beers -- these would be
beers like Olympia, Milwaukee's Best, Rolling Rock, etc.  The slogan
of "Olympia" beer is "It's the water."  Yeah, no kidding.

I have read that some young people in Germany think it is very trendy
to be American, and will pay exhorbitant prices -- $2 to $3 per glass --
for cheap American beers like Bud or Miller.

If you make a graph, with hops on one axis and malt on the other,
beers like Bud and Miller are near the origin in the lower-left hand 
corner, and beers like Sam Adams and European beers are in the
upper-right area.  Most beers lie along a straight line connecting
the two, but there are a few outliers (like Lowenbrau, which lies
in the lower-right corner -- lots of malt compared with the hops).

Finally, just to give a little historical perspective... it turns out
that Bud and Miller -- the two biggest brewers -- used to be rather
small.  "Schlitz" used to be the most popular beer, followed by
"Hamms" and other now-obscure beers.  Like many companies in the 70's,
they thought they knew what was best for the consumers.  At one point
Schlitz changed its formula, and it caused a slime to form on the
inside of the cans.  Suddenly Budweiser got a lot of business, and
became huge.  Miller was tiny until they came up with the first "Lite"
beer -- then they became huge, with other non-Lite offerings.

There, who says you don't learn anything by hanging out with the 64
crowd? :)

-S (Who really doesn't know why he knows all of the above stuff)
-
This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list.
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tcm.hut.fi.

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.