ANE (fwd)

From: Marko Mäkelä (msmakela_at_cc.hut.fi)
Date: 1998-07-23 14:14:02

This was sent to the plus4 list.  Previously I knew (from Andreas Boose)
that the $8B opcode (or was it $AB, anyway the opcode with 
non-deterministic behaviour) behaves differently if DMA takes place
between the opcode fetch and the parameter fetch.

	Marko
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 13:55:15 +0200
From: Tibor Biczo <crown@mail.matav.hu>
Reply-To: plus4@c64.rulez.org
To: plus4@c64.rulez.org
Subject: ANE

Hi there,

I was playing a bit with ANE opcode $8B, and found out,
that the result is also dependant on the instruction which
was executed before it! I had the instruction execute
on a fixed raster dot, and the result was mostly stable
(Certain bits sometimes seemed to be not stable), and
if I changed the instruction before it so that the registers
remained the same (like changing an STA to an STX) the result
of the instruction changed. I haven't gone into details, much
further.
This was on a 8501, and I wonder if one of the C64 owner would
check this on the 6502?

Tibor Biczo / Crown of GOTU


--this message went through the plus4@c64.rulez.org emailing list---

-
This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list.
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tcm.hut.fi.

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.