From: Patrycjusz R. Łogiewa (silverdr_at_inet.com.pl)
Date: 2005-05-08 16:53:32
On 2005-05-08, at 14:51, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:
>
> Ok, I had a look into both the probing routines of the 1541 drive and
> the 1571 drive. You are right, they both do lousy jobs in spreading the
> sectors over the track, thus, so much bytes are not unlikely.
>
> "Our" probing formatter is much better (and faster!) ;-)
Just to clarify: I don't expect any credit for _your_ routines ;-) I
was more referring to "us" as a community vs. "them" as the original
CBM programmers.
--
Democracy, n.: The triumph of popularity over principle.
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.