RE: X-IDE directory (2)

From: Pete Rittwage (peter_at_rittwage.com)
Date: 2008-01-11 22:31:50

• Next message: Ruud_at_baltissen.org: "X-IDE image version"
• Previous message: Jim Brain: "Re: X-IDE directory (2)"
• Maybe in reply to: ruud.baltissen_at_abp.nl: "RE: X-IDE directory (2)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Guys,

As far as D64's are concerned, they could be supported as "partitions"
with a size of 664 blocks, as opposed to 16M XIDE partitions, which would
be 65280 blocks (one track for directory and BAM seems reasonable).

This should not take more RAM, because you only need to store the offset
and size of the current partition you are accessing.

-
Pete Rittwage
C64 Preservation Project
http://c64preservation.com


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

• Next message: Ruud_at_baltissen.org: "X-IDE image version"
• Previous message: Jim Brain: "Re: X-IDE directory (2)"
• Maybe in reply to: ruud.baltissen_at_abp.nl: "RE: X-IDE directory (2)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.