From: Ethan Dicks (ethan.dicks_at_gmail.com)
Date: 2008-03-19 17:15:50
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:25 PM, <Ruud@baltissen.org> wrote:
> Hallo Ethan,
> > With modern components, perhaps one way around that would be to
> > use eight 44C256s? Looking at the board in front of me, I don't
> > think it would be tricky to rig them up to the existing board holes.
>
> Why using 44c256's, or did I miss an email? IMHO you can replace the 4164's
> by 41256's.
I mentioned 44C256s because of the heat issue mentioned in this thread
- you need 1/4 as many chips, and 44C256s are CMOS and not uncommon.
Of course 41256s would work electrically and logically.
-ethan
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.