Nate Lawson wrote:
> There's quite a lot of SPI flash, although I don't see why he needs high
> capacity or clock rate to support the replacement ROM application.
> http://www.winbond-usa.com/en/content/view/290/553/
>
> Flash is a pretty easy state machine and x8 parts mean you could
> probably do it with 2 shift registers. I haven't thought of the
> fewest-parts approach though.
>   
Can you clarify your idea?  I've seen SPI flash (and I2C flash), but I 
didn;t see a good way to interface that directly with the target system 
and a uC at the same time.

Jim


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list