8.91 vac On Dec 9, 2010, at 12:31 PM, MikeS wrote: > Hi Philip! > > What AC voltage do you get between the two white wires? > > mike > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philip Lord" <random6000@mac.com> > To: <cbm-hackers@musoftware.de> > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:07 PM > Subject: Re: Pet64 DOA > > >> Sorry maybe I should have tested the some lines using AC not DC. >> So here again is what I believe I have (suing the black line as GND): >> White: - 5.8 vac >> (KEY) >> White - 0.5 vac >> Black (I'm guessing this is ground) >> Red - 4.98 vdc >> Of course I could just be confused as I've never owned a C64 before. >> Looking at schematics seems maybe the two white lines could/should >> be 9vac, and maybe the red line should be 5 vdc??? >> Phil >> On Dec 9, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Philip Lord wrote: >>> I just got myself a PET64 from Yahoo Auction Japan. Quite a rare >>> machine I hear, so I'm not sure how one ended up in Japan. I got >>> if for a decent price as I don't think the Japanese knew exactly >>> what it was. >>> >>> Anyway, It arrived the other day, after a quick internal >>> inspection, I powered it on. I can hear the transformer >>> buzzing(!), but no action at all on the screen at all, and it >>> doesn't seem like the chips are getting warm at all Maybe need to >>> leave it on a little longer to make sure, but I didn't want to do >>> that incase bad voltages kill anything more). >>> >>> There are 4 wires leading from the small PCB which is attached to >>> the transformer to the C64 motherboard, and I have measured the >>> voltage from the black wire (GND?) to the 3 others. Here are the >>> reading i get: >>> >>> White: - 100mv >>> (KEY) >>> White - 100mv >>> Black (I'm guessing this is ground) >>> Red - 4.98v >>> >>> That's as far as I have gotten. Next I will remove the >>> motherboard and see where exactly these 4 wires go. >>> Anyway, I was just wondering if anyone had any insights or thoughts. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Phil >> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2010-12-09 04:00:24
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.