Start from the 6510 RESET# line and work backwards. What is that connected to? On Dec 10 2010, Philip Lord wrote: >Ok this morning I printed out the schematic and theory of operation >for the C64. > >The theory of operation states that the reset signal is originally >produced at pin 9 of the 556 time (MC3456p in my case). The output is >active high. I have tested this pin with my probe, and it does indeed >switch from low to high on power-up. The theory of operation then says >that this signal is sent to pin 13 of a 7406 hex inverter (U8) and the >output from the 7406 is active low from pin 12...this is the reset >signal. > >However, on my machine pin 9 of the 556 is tied to pin 13 (on the same >556) with some wire, and I have tested the continuity from pin 9 of >the 556 to pin 13 of the 7604, and I can't see any physical connection >between these pins which in contrary to the schematic and the theory >manual. Maybe I'll pull the board out and have a look at the bottom >side for any damage or cut traces. > >I probed pins 12 and 13 of the 7406 and pin 12 is always low and pin >13 is always high. > >So I'm a little confused...this doesn't seem right. Maybe I can I >briefly apply 5v to pin 12 of the 7604 to see what happens? > >Maybe I have the wrong schematic, but I don't think so. I'll look for >others anyway. > > > > >On Dec 10, 2010, at 12:43 AM, MikeS wrote: > >> The supply voltages to the ICs are all correct? >> >> Reset line is being released? >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philip Lord" <random6000@mac.com> >> To: <cbm-hackers@musoftware.de> >> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 3:23 AM >> Subject: Re: Pet64 DOA >> >> >>> Well, it seems like the power might be ok after all, so I broke out >>> my logic probe...it's a cheap one but has helped me fix many >>> simple issues over the years. >>> The first think I noticed after probing around is that I'm not >>> getting any pulsing (or at least that what the probe indicates), >>> lines are either high, or low, or nothing, but there doesn't seem >>> to be any pulsing at all! >>> So I guess I should look at the timing circuit or Xtal? Anywhere >>> else? Not sure how to test is a Xtal is working as I don't think >>> my probe can do that. >>> Cheers >>> Phil >>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Philip Lord wrote: >>>> Great...so then maybe my power voltages are all good? Should I >>>> find some test point on the C64 motherboard and get some voltages >>>> there? Any idea what I should check next? >>>> >>>> Re-PET board. Ethan has been working very hard, and he believes >>>> he has fixed both boards now (but can not test loading as his C2N >>>> data cassette deck is in need of a new drive belt). Last I heard >>>> everything is almost packed up and ready to ship. It would be >>>> great to get the boards back before years end, as I have been >>>> building a number of add-ons in anticipation for their arrival >>>> and I'm excited to try everything out. >>>> I have built one of Nicolas Welte's Ram/Rom boards which will >>>> hopefully take my ram to 32k and allow me to use various basics >>>> (V1 through V4) and not have to worry about failing RAM in the >>>> future. I have also built a number of adaptor boards to replace >>>> the video ram and character ROM. Finally I got myself a C2N232 as >>>> I don't know how reliable the original cassette drive is. I'm >>>> hoping to 'fail proof' this machine for at least another 30 >>>> years ;-) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 1:44 PM, MikeS wrote: >>>> >>>>> 5V DC and 9V AC - sounds OK. >>>>> >>>>> Did you finally get your PET boards back and working? >>>>> >>>>> m >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philip Lord" <random6000@mac.com >>>>> > >>>>> To: <cbm-hackers@musoftware.de> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:41 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: Pet64 DOA >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 8.91 vac >>>>>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 12:31 PM, MikeS wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Philip! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What AC voltage do you get between the two white wires? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> mike >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philip Lord" >>>>>>> <random6000@mac.com >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> To: <cbm-hackers@musoftware.de> >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:07 PM >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Pet64 DOA >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry maybe I should have tested the some lines using AC not DC. >>>>>>>> So here again is what I believe I have (suing the black line >>>>>>>> as GND): >>>>>>>> White: - 5.8 vac >>>>>>>> (KEY) >>>>>>>> White - 0.5 vac >>>>>>>> Black (I'm guessing this is ground) >>>>>>>> Red - 4.98 vdc >>>>>>>> Of course I could just be confused as I've never owned a C64 >>>>>>>> before. >>>>>>>> Looking at schematics seems maybe the two white lines could/ >>>>>>>> should be 9vac, and maybe the red line should be 5 vdc??? >>>>>>>> Phil >>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Philip Lord wrote: >>>>>>>>> I just got myself a PET64 from Yahoo Auction Japan. Quite a >>>>>>>>> rare machine I hear, so I'm not sure how one ended up in >>>>>>>>> Japan. I got if for a decent price as I don't think the >>>>>>>>> Japanese knew exactly what it was. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Anyway, It arrived the other day, after a quick internal >>>>>>>>> inspection, I powered it on. I can hear the transformer >>>>>>>>> buzzing(!), but no action at all on the screen at all, and >>>>>>>>> it doesn't seem like the chips are getting warm at all >>>>>>>>> Maybe need to leave it on a little longer to make sure, >>>>>>>>> but I didn't want to do that incase bad voltages kill >>>>>>>>> anything more). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There are 4 wires leading from the small PCB which is >>>>>>>>> attached to the transformer to the C64 motherboard, and I >>>>>>>>> have measured the voltage from the black wire (GND?) to >>>>>>>>> the 3 others. Here are the reading i get: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> White: - 100mv >>>>>>>>> (KEY) >>>>>>>>> White - 100mv >>>>>>>>> Black (I'm guessing this is ground) >>>>>>>>> Red - 4.98v >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's as far as I have gotten. Next I will remove the >>>>>>>>> motherboard and see where exactly these 4 wires go. >>>>>>>>> Anyway, I was just wondering if anyone had any insights or >>>>>>>>> thoughts. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>> Phil >>>>>>>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >>>>>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >>>>> >>>>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >>>> >>>> >>>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >> >> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2010-12-10 03:00:31
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.