Re: Pet64 DOA

From: matt <galaga_at_slingshot.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:19:08 +1300
Message-ID: <001d01cb984b$4cc047f0$0900a8c0@mattaileens>
can i see some pix.
 is it a pet or c64???

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Philip Lord" <random6000@mac.com>
To: <cbm-hackers@musoftware.de>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: Pet64 DOA


> Thanks Richard,
> It's the PLL version as far as I know, as It's the original 326298-01  REV 
> A board.
>
> Well, I'm not sure I have any equipment that can test the clock  circuit, 
> and I haven't the first idea how to approach it actually.
>
> I think trying to acquire a second c64 motherboard would be a good  idea, 
> but certainly not a cheap one as I'd probably have to buy a c64  from ebay 
> and have it shipped from the US to Japan!!!
>
> There is a C64 on Japan Yahoo auction at the moment, but it's like US 
> $100+ !!!!
>
> :-(
>
>
> On Dec 10, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Richard Atkinson wrote:
>
>> Is it a MOS 8701 based clock circuit or a discrete PLL version?  Probably 
>> the latter if it's an early C64 board. That's quite a  complex circuit 
>> with lots to go wrong. You should be looking for a  14.31818MHz crystal 
>> and a working circuit for that for the colour  clock, a divide by 14 
>> circuit producing a 1.02MHz clock and an 8MHz  voltage controlled 
>> oscillator producing the dot clock, which gets  divided down by 8 by the 
>> VIC-II chip to produce another 1.02MHz  clock. These two 1.02MHz clocks 
>> should be kept phase locked by the  circuit controlling the 8MHz VCO.
>>
>> Have you also tried the standard C64 chips trick of finding another  C64 
>> board of the same era that's known to work, and swapping out all  the 
>> socketed chips in the Pet 64 board for the ones in the other  board?
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> On Dec 10 2010, Philip Lord wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Richard,
>>> Maybe I should have checked there first...
>>> The reset pin 40 on the 6510 seems to get the correct reset signal,  It 
>>> starts low then goes high. Can I assume that the reset is  working?
>>>
>>> Maybe next I should look at the clock circuit as it doesn't look  like 
>>> I'm getting any pulsing. Does anyone know what I should check  next?
>>>
>>> Cheers..again
>>> Phil
>>>
>>> On Dec 10, 2010, at 11:42 AM, Richard Atkinson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Start from the 6510 RESET# line and work backwards. What is that 
>>>> connected to?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 10 2010, Philip Lord wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ok this morning I printed out the schematic and theory of   operation 
>>>>> for the C64.
>>>>>
>>>>> The theory of operation states that the reset signal is  originally 
>>>>> produced at pin 9 of the 556 time (MC3456p in my  case). The output 
>>>>> is  active high. I have tested this pin with  my probe, and it does 
>>>>> indeed  switch from low to high on power- up. The theory of  operation 
>>>>> then says  that this signal is sent  to pin 13 of a 7406  hex inverter 
>>>>> (U8) and the  output from the  7406 is active low from  pin 12...this 
>>>>> is the reset  signal.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, on my machine pin 9 of the 556 is tied to pin 13 (on  the 
>>>>> same  556) with some wire, and I have tested the continuity  from  pin 
>>>>> 9 of  the 556 to pin 13 of the 7604, and I can't see  any  physical 
>>>>> connection  between these pins which in contrary to  the  schematic 
>>>>> and the theory  manual. Maybe I'll pull the board  out and  have a 
>>>>> look at the bottom  side for any damage or cut  traces.
>>>>>
>>>>> I probed pins 12 and 13 of the 7406 and pin 12 is always low and   pin 
>>>>> 13 is always high.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I'm a little confused...this doesn't seem right. Maybe I can  I 
>>>>> briefly apply 5v to pin 12 of the 7604 to see what happens?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe I have the wrong schematic, but I don't think so. I'll  look 
>>>>> for  others anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 10, 2010, at 12:43 AM, MikeS wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The supply voltages to the ICs are all correct?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reset line is being released?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philip Lord"  <random6000@mac.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> To: <cbm-hackers@musoftware.de>
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 3:23 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Pet64 DOA
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, it seems like the power might be ok after all, so I  broke 
>>>>>>> out  my  logic probe...it's a cheap one but has helped  me fix  many 
>>>>>>> simple  issues over the years.
>>>>>>> The first think I noticed after probing around is that I'm  not 
>>>>>>> getting  any pulsing (or at least that what the probe   indicates), 
>>>>>>> lines are  either high, or low, or nothing, but   there doesn't seem 
>>>>>>> to be any  pulsing at all!
>>>>>>> So I guess I should look at the timing circuit or Xtal?  Anywhere 
>>>>>>> else?  Not sure how to test is a Xtal is working as  I don't  think 
>>>>>>> my probe  can do that.
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> Phil
>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Philip Lord wrote:
>>>>>>>> Great...so then maybe my power voltages are all good? Should  I 
>>>>>>>> find  some test point on the C64 motherboard and get some 
>>>>>>>> voltages  there?  Any idea what I should check next?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Re-PET board. Ethan has been working very hard, and he  believes 
>>>>>>>> he  has fixed both boards now (but can not test  loading as his 
>>>>>>>> C2N  data  cassette deck is in need of a new  drive belt). Last I 
>>>>>>>> heard   everything is almost packed up  and ready to ship. It 
>>>>>>>> would be  great  to get the boards back  before years end, as I 
>>>>>>>> have been  building a  number of add- ons in anticipation for 
>>>>>>>> their arrival  and I'm excited  to  try everything out.
>>>>>>>> I have built one of Nicolas Welte's Ram/Rom boards which  will 
>>>>>>>> hopefully take my ram to 32k and allow me to use  various basics 
>>>>>>>> (V1  through V4) and not have to worry about  failing RAM in the 
>>>>>>>> future. I  have also built a number of  adaptor boards to  replace 
>>>>>>>> the video ram  and character ROM.  Finally I got myself  a C2N232 
>>>>>>>> as  I don't know how  reliable  the original cassette  drive is. 
>>>>>>>> I'm  hoping to 'fail proof'   this machine for at least  another 30 
>>>>>>>> years ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 1:44 PM, MikeS wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 5V DC and 9V AC - sounds OK.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Did you finally get your PET boards back and working?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> m
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philip Lord" 
>>>>>>>>> <random6000@mac.com
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> To: <cbm-hackers@musoftware.de>
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:41 PM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Pet64 DOA
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 8.91 vac
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 12:31 PM, MikeS wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Philip!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What AC voltage do you get between the two white wires?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> mike
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philip Lord" 
>>>>>>>>>>> <random6000@mac.com
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> To: <cbm-hackers@musoftware.de>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:07 PM
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Pet64 DOA
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry maybe I should have tested the some lines using AC  not 
>>>>>>>>>>>> DC.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So here again is what I believe I have (suing the black   line 
>>>>>>>>>>>> as  GND):
>>>>>>>>>>>> White: - 5.8 vac
>>>>>>>>>>>> (KEY)
>>>>>>>>>>>> White - 0.5 vac
>>>>>>>>>>>> Black (I'm guessing this is ground)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Red - 4.98 vdc
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course I could just be confused as I've never owned a   C64 
>>>>>>>>>>>> before.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking at schematics seems maybe the two white lines   could/ 
>>>>>>>>>>>> should  be  9vac, and maybe the red line should be  5  vdc???
>>>>>>>>>>>> Phil
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Philip Lord wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just got myself a PET64 from Yahoo Auction Japan.  Quite  a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rare   machine I hear, so I'm not sure how one  ended up  in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Japan. I got  if  for a decent price as I  don't think  the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Japanese knew exactly  what  it was.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, It arrived the other day, after a quick  internal 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> inspection,  I powered it on. I can hear the  transformer 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> buzzing(!), but no  action at all on the  screen at all,  and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it   doesn't seem like the  chips  are getting warm at  all 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe need  to  leave it on a  little  longer to make  sure, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I didn't  want to do   that incase bad  voltages  kill 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything more).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are 4 wires leading from the small PCB which is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attached  to   the transformer to the C64 motherboard,  and  I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have  measured the   voltage from the black wire  (GND?)  to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 3  others. Here are the   reading i get:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> White: - 100mv
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (KEY)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> White - 100mv
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Black (I'm guessing this is ground)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Red - 4.98v
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's as far as I have gotten. Next I will remove  the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> motherboard  and see where exactly these 4 wires  go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, I was just wondering if anyone had any insights   or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Phil
>>>>>>>>>>>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>  Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>>>>>    Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>
>>>
>>>      Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>
>>
>>      Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>
>
>       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
> signature database 5690 (20101209) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> 


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2010-12-10 10:00:09

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.