On Tue 28 Dec 2010 at 08:33:28 -0500, Justin wrote: > Perhaps they are so lazy they haven't actually changed anything in > VICE, so there is no source to contribute. if VICE launches and still > has the copyright markings it otherwise has, then there may be no > issue and they are just distributing it via giant flash drive. Maybe they haven't changed anything. But that still doesn't absolve them of their obligations. They may even include the source on the cd, for all I know, that's why I asked my original question. If they did that, and it would be trivial for them to do that, they're in the clear. Here are some informative URLs. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html http://www.busybox.net/license.html <-- very informative! http://www.gpl-violations.org/faq/vendor-faq.html http://www.gpl-violations.org/faq/sourcecode-faq.html -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- There's no point being grown-up if you \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl -- can't be childish sometimes. -The 4th Doctor Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2010-12-28 14:00:19
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.