Re: Procep SECAM Re: C16/Plus4

From: Segher Boessenkool <segher_at_kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 21:58:17 +0100
Message-Id: <1F70EF11-F5E7-47EB-B36E-0F51953B7ED2@kernel.crashing.org>
Hi Richard,

> You needed glass delay lines to decode PAL or SECAM, not to encode  
> them.

[snip]

Ah.  So it would have been much simpler for your vic->secam external
circuit if the VIC did not do the PAL alternating thing?  They could
have done a chip like that easily.  Or do you still need a lot of
conversion circuitry that way?


Segher


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2011-11-02 22:00:13

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.