On 2012-04-19 14:38, Ed Johnson wrote: > What ever happened to Butterfield? Isn’t he the one that wrote DOS 5.1 > and a BBS program? > He died in 2007 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Butterfield /Uffe > *From:*owner-cbm-hackers@musoftware.de > [mailto:owner-cbm-hackers@musoftware.de] *On Behalf Of *Jim Brain > *Sent:* Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:34 AM > *To:* cbm-hackers@musoftware.de > *Subject:* Re: about the plus4 > > On 4/19/2012 6:46 AM, didier derny wrote: > > > > - bad machine for games > - bad machine for professional use > > I'm pressed for time this morning, but find the link to Bil Herd's > discussion of the 264 series. > > In short: > > * Good machine (C116) to compete with Timex Sinclair (better graphics, > better sound, arguable bit better KB) > * Good price point ($49) > > But: > > * Jack was less involved in the end (Butterfield or Herd note he left > CBM towards the end of the design cycle) > * CBM tried to "scale" up the C116 to be a serious machine (Plus/4) > * CBM did not succeed. Vendors were mad because it was not C64 > compatible, customers were mad because it didn't improve on C64, etc. > > Folks may disagree with my issues listed above, but in my opinion the > machine's fate was served badly by the decision to scale it up and the > lack of focus since Jack was already planning his exit. > > Jim > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2012-04-19 13:00:27
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.