Re: 6809 / 6702 puzzle

From: davee.roberts_at_fsmail.net
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:26:01 +0200
Message-ID: <24002439.6451335777961498.JavaMail.www@wwinf3711>
Have a look at "http://www.4004.com/" for what can be achieved by reverse engineering the die! See the readme.txt file from the first ZIP 
download by Lajos Kintle.

Dave

> Message Received: Apr 30 2012, 09:59 AM
> From: "Rhialto" <rhialto@falu.nl>
> To: cbm-hackers@musoftware.de
> Cc: 
> Subject: Re: 6809 / 6702 puzzle
> 
> On Mon 30 Apr 2012 at 04:39:58 +0000, William Levak wrote:
> > 2)  A hardware chip of this size would have a response time of 50
> > micrseconds, or less.  PEEKing and POKing from BASIC may not be fast
> > enough to see all the output.
> 
> Possibly. But so far, the sequence that I read out with the Basic
> program passes validation. Both by the C version of the validation
> routine and the original one (running in VICE). (I've been lazy though
> and haven't tried all values that I posted here, just the first set).
> 
> It would be interesting to see results from die shots from the
> visual6502 people, but I have no idea how soon we can expect that. (Not
> that I can read die shots but other people can..)
> 
> -Olaf.
> -- 
> ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert  -- There's no point being grown-up if you 
> \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl    -- can't be childish sometimes. -The 4th Doctor
> 
>        Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
> 

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2012-04-30 10:00:19

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.