On 2012-05-13, at 23:08, Marko Mäkelä wrote: >> It seems that the R3 displays colours noticeably brighter than R4 for example (I remain at PAL only) although it seems to be better (more uniformly) distributed in the higher range in R3, R4 seems to be doing better in the lower (darker) range. Also seems to me, only by looking at the picture in question, that R5 is a sort of compromise between R3 and R4. Now, has anyone on the list a chance to test this in practice and say (very subjectively of course) which "looks best in real life applications"? > > Yes, you should have a chance, given that I gave you (or Ruud) my collection of VIC-II chips a couple of years ago. I could do this myself but the only problem is that I am several hundreds of miles away from my place where I have all the stuff. The good part is that I have a bit more time now, that's why I am so strangely active here.. ;-) -- SD! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2012-05-13 23:00:12
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.