Hello, * On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 04:07:47AM +0000 William Levak wrote: > On Fri, 12 Apr 2013, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote: > >>"0:?*" is only necessary if you got a file not found error, where the next load may try to load from the nonexistant drive 1. > > > >Wouldn't in such case a "0:*" still be sufficient? > > Since you have previously referenced a file, * now means last file > referenced. *sigh* Have you actually tested this? Yes, you are right "*" references the last file. However, silverdr told you to use "0:*", which does NOT reference the last accessed file, but the first file on drive 0. We tried to explain this to you more than once. BTW: EVen your first argument does not hold. If you try to load a file that does not exist, and afterwards, you try to load "*", you get the first file (again). Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://www.trikaliotis.net/ Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2013-04-13 07:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.