Hello Greg, * On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:17:23AM -0400 Greg King wrote: > >Unfortunately, I don't think any of these work; they all set > >the test-mode bit (bit 1) to 1 (on)? > > Does that matter? The original test bit (in $d016) crashed the > system because it disabled the dynamic RAM refresh (therefore, it > was removed). You mean: There are chip revisions where the test bit actually does something? On my 6569 (datecode from early 1983), it was a no-op. Regards, Spiro Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2013-05-23 19:00:07
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.