Re: BASIC listing..

From: silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:09:54 +0200 Message-Id: <7F10B484-8E14-4AF0-A223-34AA1F847043@wfmh.org.pl>

On 2013-06-10, at 20:34, Michał Pleban wrote:

>> On execution, things are different. The interpreter interprets aa .. hh,
>> whatever they mean. Then, it sees the $00 as end of the line.
>> Next, it examines the following link pointer (xx, yy). For the
>> interpreter to step here, yy must be $00 - otherwise, it will happily
>> interpret the rest of the memory.
> 
> But, I guess, if aa..hh are a SYS to some routine that never returns to
> BASIC,

Right - that's exactly what I had in mind at first but then, after Spiro's explanations, I realised that it anyway wouldn't make much sense in cc65 (even if it worked on LISTing - but it doesn't) as we want clean returns from the ML code if needed.

-- 
SD!

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list