On 2013-06-18, at 21:09, Ruud@Baltissen.org wrote: >> Interesting that they sourced a 6821 instead of just >> adding a '574/'245 or something simple. > > Just "a '574/'245" means (at least) 40 pins to solder. A 6821 has > 40 pins as well plus it has more functions. > > But what makes me wonder, why a 6821 and not a 6522? Price? I don't remember the prices of the days but I believe that 6821 was noticeably less expensive and produced probably in bigger volumes -- SD! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2013-06-18 23:00:59
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.