Marko Mäkelä wrote: > > I know. But on the C128 it's even worse than this, because clock > > stretching occurs on only some I/O accesses. > > Isn't it only when the I/O access would happen in VIC-IIe's cycle half? I That's it. > > So you never really know if an I/O access at 2MHz speed takes one or > > two cycles. > > You must just know the context, that's all. And after an I/O access you > will be sure that the next instruction will start on a "normal" cycle, > i.e. not on the half that was stolen from the video chip. Good idea! And after that cycles can be counted, if necessary. One thing less to worry about ;-) Nicolas - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tcm.hut.fi.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.