Re: D9090 back to life !

From: Rob Eaglestone <robert.eaglestone_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 07:51:34 -0600
Message-ID: <CABNTyr8F93kg1WxLuH7Eq4REzD3p7nSMB6B+udnP6ZYmuT4ziw@mail.gmail.com>
In other words, the metadata is optional, and useful when present.  This is
not an unusual solution.

If I recall Peter Schepers' useful informational webpages, X64 isn't used
much exactly because it's a container format, and basically has to be
interpreted twice -- once to figure out what the format is, and then once
again to actually get at the image data.

http://ist.uwaterloo.ca/~schepers/formats/X64.TXT

There is no advantage for PC users to use this format since virtually no PC
> emulator that I know of uses them, and for the most part, it provides the
> same functionality as a D64 file.



> In order to read a generic X64 file, first you must determine that it is
> an X64, and then determine the type of file it contains. In effect, you
> have to double-decode the file, which makes support a little more
> difficult. Also, you would have to be able to work with *all* of the types
> of drives that X64 supports, a daunting task.



> Its only advantage is that is encompasses all of the standard disk formats
> on the C64. If other disk types were common (like 1581 or CMD disks), then
> this format might be more popular.
>



On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Jim Brain <brain@jbrain.com> wrote:

> On 1/28/2014 12:59 AM, Groepaz wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 28 January 2014, you wrote:
>>
>>> I agree it's a more complete format, but it's not used as much.  My idea
>>> of putting this same information on track 18 would add this information
>>> to the image, and has the benefit that folks could "see" if the disk
>>> came from an image when they use a real disk.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I know it "corrupts" the image.  complaints to /dev/null
>>>
>> the major problem with that approach is that it doesnt work on disks that
>> are
>> completely filled with data (which isnt really unlikely, lots of cracks
>> and
>> demos use the dirtrack for files, for example) - which rules it out as a
>> generic solution.
>>
>>  Well, since the block has a magic sequence, any block will work. Yes,
> though, on a completely filled disk, it's not workable.
>
> Still, for the millions of D64s that are not full, it's fine.  And, if the
> D64 does not have the block, it's not like it fails to work.
>
> It's like an MP3 in that way.
>
> Jim
>
>
> --
> Jim Brain
> brain@jbrain.com
> www.jbrain.com
>
>
>
>       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2014-01-28 14:02:46

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.