>Pragmatically, it would be helpful if the bits could be ignored safely. >Holding them in registers kicks the needed register count up to 48 from 24, >pushing one into more expensive options. You can't know the risk without knowing what the real hardware does, for that you need a working chip. But you can just do the bare minimum and hope nobody was stupid enough to rely on those bits. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2014-03-09 19:00:36
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.