-----Message d'origine----- De : owner-cbm-hackers@musoftware.de [mailto:owner-cbm-hackers@musoftware.de] De la part de Jim Brain Envoyé : samedi 3 janvier 2015 02:48 À : cbm-hackers@musoftware.de Objet : Re: 6502 with logic sniffer >On 1/2/2015 4:35 PM, Uffe Jakobsen wrote: >> >> >> On 2015-01-02 23:09, didier derny wrote: >>> The cbm3000 had a relatively short life around 1979/1980 >>> >>> I'm using this product: >>> http://dangerousprototypes.com/open-logic-sniffer/ >>> >>> I give up this product is hell, loosing the usb serial port (need >>> reboot each time it is disconnected) The documentation is poor, >>> browsing a lot of web pages to find some elementary information's >>> >> >> Aah, yes the Open Bench LogicSniffer, I have one of those. >> >> Are you using the OLS java GUI ? >> >> I have no serial port problems on linux - but guessing from your >> mail-client I guess that you are on Windows. >> >>> Apparently the vhdl code for this specific model is not available (I >>> wanted to check the .ucf file to find the information I needed) >> >> Yes, It seems to closed source - there seems to be no development on >> its features (and bugs) - it is a dead project. >> >> Compared to other commercial LAs its proces is extremely low for up to >> 32 channels. >> >> It has some nice features- up to 200Mhz sampling - *BUT* only 216k >> sampling memory (not so nice). That is compensated by its ability to >> do RLE compression of its samples - which often can save you >> especially with low-frequency retro systems like CBMs where it in >> theory can stream the RLE samples to the host system "forever"... >How does that compare to the LWLA1034? I bought one a few months back, but have not done much with >it. It was USD$70.00, so I thought it worth a gamble. It seems to work fine, all channels are 0-5V >capable. Hi Jim, I checked for another product almost for the entire day yesterday... I found the LWLA1034 and I ordered one It also has a external trigger and external clock I have to wait a few weeks to restart my project Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2015-01-03 08:00:38
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.