So, finally, the machine works! In fact the ACIA was broken and I had to replace it. In total I had to fix: - the power supply - 3 dRAM chips - CRTC - CIA - ACIA - 556 from the reset circuitry https://www.flickr.com/photos/afachat/sets/72157647798386959/ Now it's to the cleaning, and maybe replacing the fan with one that works on the PC power supply I used to replace the broken original pwr supply. Thanks to all who helped with info and suggestions! André On Saturday 03 January 2015 23:19:59 you wrote: > Hi, > > on further investigation I found that that the clock signal on the ACIA is > missing. I.e. the simple XTLO/XTLI-connected crystal-based oscillator does > not start. No signal on XTLI, also no signal on RxC (which is output of the > basic clock when the internal clock is used). > > So no wonder I don't get anything. And indeed the comm parameters are > different from the C64 - esp. the secondary address. You need to set bit 0 > (value 1) for sending, and bit 1 (value 2) for receiving (and may add 128 > to convert between ASCII and PETSCII) - stuff that IIRC isn't available on > the C64. > > On the BEELINE program, I get a > ?BAD SUBSCRIPT IN 3660 > after loading the function keys. > I'm afraid I can't see what could be the reason. Maybe it only runs on a > 128k machine? Or on a 6x0 only? > > Anyway, what do you think more likely? A broken 6551 or a broken crystal? Or > maybe add a small cap across the crystal? I seem to remember that this > helped at one time (but not sure if on a 6551). > > Thanks > Andre > > On Saturday 03 January 2015 12:55:22 you wrote: > > > Thanks. I still need to fiddle with the comm parameters in the BASIC > > > > terminal prog. With Beeline I get a BASIC error during initialization. > > Something with array indexes. More details later, have to run. > > > > André > > > > Am 3. Januar 2015 04:47:08 schrieb william degnan <billdegnan@gmail.com>: > > > I was using BLine tonight to connect with my CBM 256 make simple > > > internet > > > connections via a Raspberry Pi. You have to play around with it though. > > > Not perfect. I was able to send a test email to myself (not this > > > message) > > > > > > Here is the D80 file if you want to try it > > > http://vintagecomputer.net/commodore/D80_BSeries/BEELINE.D80 > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Steve Gray <sjgray@rogers.com> wrote: > > > > Ok, I found two different ones. The following is the simplest: > > > > > > > > 1 FORa=1TO10:READk$:KEYa,k$:NEXT > > > > 2 DATA cat1,cat2,cat3,cat4,cat5,cat6,cat7,sysop,steve,gray > > > > 10 PRINT"{HOME}{HOME}{CLR}{TEXT}{RVS} Simple > > > > Basic > > > > Terminal Program -SJG "CHR$(27)"t{CLR}{RVSOFF}"; > > > > 20 TRAP100:POKE55296,10:POKE55297,96 > > > > 30 OPEN1,2,131,CHR$(6)+CHR$(0)+"++ > > > > 40 GET#1,a$:PRINTa$;:GETb$:PRINT#1,b$;:PRINTb$;:GOTO40 > > > > 100 CLOSE1:PRINT:PRINT"Stopped.":END > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > So it reads definitions for 10 function keys in lines 1. Change line 2 > > > > as > > > > you wish. > > > > Line 10 prints a simple header on the first line then sets up a window > > > > to > > > > protect it from scrolling off the screen. > > > > Line 20 traps errors and sets the cursor to blinking via CRTC > > > > registers > > > > Line 30 opens the RS-232 channel. > > > > - 131 tells it to convert ASCII to/from PETSCII > > > > - CHR$(6) is 300 baud, 8 bit, 1 stop bit. > > > > - The "++" is needed for B-series but not used (see transactor's CCISA > > > > page 105 for RS-232 parameters). > > > > Line 40 accepts keyboard/modem input as prints to the screen. > > > > Line 100 closes things if there is an error. > > > > > > > > That's it. > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > *From:* Steve Gray <sjgray@rogers.com> > > > > > > > > *To:* "cbm-hackers@musoftware.de" <cbm-hackers@musoftware.de> > > > > *Sent:* Friday, January 2, 2015 1:53 PM > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: CBM720 heads up > > > > > > > > I wrote a simple CBM-II terminal program in BASIC. If anyone is > > > > interested > > > > I can dig it out and post it. > > > > > > > > Steve > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2015-01-03 23:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.