Hallo allemaal, I could be completely wrong but IIRC JiffyDOS is faster than SpeedDOS. If that indeed is the case, I wonder why? My only explanation: bad programming. If this is indeed the case, one could examine the code of SpeedDOS and try to improve it. Then the thought crossed my mind: what about replacing the part that handles the serial transmission of bytes in JD by a parallel transmission? IMHO JD could become even faster! OK, and what has IEEE to do with this? The idea was NOT using the userport for the parallel part but an IEEE cartridge. Nice touch: this can be realised by taking the JD Kernal (which on itself is also an overlay (but to be done yet)) as base and creating a overlay that contains the parallel routines. Maybe just a weird idea.... :) -- Kind regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Ruud Baltissen www.Baltissen.org Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2015-01-24 22:00:04
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.