On 12/08/2016 12:18, Christian Euler wrote: > >> I thought that if the chip has the same number then it's the same >> chip. And PAL vs NTSC would differ with something more noticeable >> than minor "revision" digit. More like 6567/6569. Which seem to be >> the case with 8361/8367 but I never encountered any 8361. > No, not really. The four-digit number printed on MOS ICs is the die > number, which may have different bond-outs. A former Commodore service > technician once told me that the CBM part number is more reliable for > correct Agnus IC identification. See the attached file for details. The four digit number was supposed to indicate whether it was a compatible replacement or not, however they got it wrong on one of them. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2016-08-13 06:01:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.