Re: MAX 6566 replacement designed and it works great!

From: Segher Boessenkool <segher_at_kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:22:12 -0500
Message-ID: <20160826192212.GB30044@gate.crashing.org>

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 07:18:33PM +0100, smf wrote:
> What 6567 did you use?
> 
> I assume the 6566 was closer to the 6567R56A than the 6567R8.

If we ever get a (good) 6566 die picture (hint hint hint), it is easy
to figure out all timings from it ;-)


Segher

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Received on 2016-08-26 20:00:13

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl: "Re: MAX 6566 replacement designed and it works great!"
Previous message: vossi: "Re: MAX 6566 replacement designed and it works great!"
In reply to: smf: "Re: MAX 6566 replacement designed and it works great!"
Next in thread: silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl: "Re: MAX 6566 replacement designed and it works great!"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.