this? http://vintagecomputer.net/commodore/2001-8/2001-8_sn20343.jpg On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Anders Carlsson <anders.carlsson@sfks.se> wrote: > Hello, > > Every now and then, there is a discussion about how come so few computer > monitors in the earlier generations had a blue display. The green and later > on amber monochrome monitors were very common, before the introduction of > colour displays. > > White on black also seems to have been quite common, which leads me to my > question: > > On Wikipedia, as well as the PET FAQ maintained by Larry Andersson, it is > said that the first line of PET 2001 had a blue on black display. I always > thought that was white on black, but if you bring down the brightness and > have less lighting around the computer, it will glow and look light blue. > > It is said that many reviews and publications back in the day referred to > the display as blue on black, and that if you increase the brightness, you > get a display so bright that text will look white instead of blue. > > I seem to recall though that VICE defaults to green, with optional > palettes for amber and white, never blue. > > What does the monitor itself look like, can one based on which phosphorous > used determine which hue it is supposed to be? If it just was Wikipedia + > hundreds of pages quoting it that had got it wrong, I wouldn't mind but if > one of our own FAQ's contain information that could be questioned, it makes > me curious. > > Best regards > > Anders Carlsson > > > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2016-09-13 18:01:26
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.