Yes indeed, a 5.25" HD drive is more or less the same logically as an 8" drive and, properly connected and configured, the controller could probably not tell the difference; on the other hand, making the correct cables, setting the drive jumpers correctly etc. adds a few more potential problems, so I'd sure try to work with the 8" drive(s) first... BTW, Frank: I watched your very nice video about repairing your 3032 and am just curious: how did you hold the camera, and what software were you using to test the IEEE port? m ----- Original Message ----- From: "Francesco Messineo" <francesco.messineo@gmail.com> To: <cbm-hackers@musoftware.de> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 1:08 PM Subject: Re: Need an 8280 formatted 8" disk > Hi, > just a suggestion: you could adapt a 5.25" HD drive in place of the 8" > just to test the controller, afair they have the same revolution speed > and data rate. > That said, I have a couple of boxes of 8" floppies but with unknown > (to me) format and media state since I don't have any 8" drive (I > whish I had). > I could donate a floppy anyway. > Frank > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Rob Clarke <crock@clarke-family.org.uk> wrote: >> >>> I wasn't suggesting going to that point, rather a simple BASIC program >>> to do a "B-R" command for blocks on different tracks which _should_ >>> cause the drive to seek, then fail as the media under the head lacked >>> the correct format to produce meaningful results. So it _would_ >>> "fail", but the head would at least move around. >> >> Good plan, I didn't think of that. I just tried it with B-R and the appears >> to step up and down correctly, but of course also fails with a read error. >> >>> I looked into >>> ftp://www.zimmers.net/pub/cbm/schematics/drives/old/8280/index.html >>> It _is_ a Tandon TM-848. That is an easy one to hook up to a >>> "modern" machine, and for reads, you wouldn't need a "TG43" signal >>> generator (though this, from John Wilson, would take care of >>> everything including 50 pin<->34 pin wiring >>> http://www.dbit.com/fdadap.html) If you did pull one of the drives >>> from the 8280, it could be hooked up to a PC and used as an 8" drive - >>> there are formatting programs, etc., out there for such use. this >>> would only get you the IBM 250K MFM format, but that's supposed to be >>> supported on the 8280, so I _think_ one would do OPEN >>> 15,8,15,"N0:MYDISK" to not format the media, but write out a BAM and >>> directory track). A valid but admittedly intermediate test to >>> formatting the whole thing. >> >> If I don't make progress in the immediate future, that could be a plan. >> >>> Oh... and since it's a dual drive, I'd also consider OPEN >>> 15,8,15,"N1:MYDISK,XX" and if that failed the same way, I would >>> probably proceed under the expectation that both drive mechs are >>> probably not faulty in the same way. >> >> Yep, I swapped the mechanisms, both exhibit same behaviour. This is why I >> initially thought the DOS board but now wonder if it's the media. >> >>> Sounds like you have someone to send you an 8280 disk so you may be >>> all set, but I'd be impatient enough to at least fiddle with something >>> to read blocks on different tracks just to ensure the FD1797 FDC is at >>> least nominally happy. Of course that won't test read/write and data >>> sep circuits or the TM848 heads, but it would test everything up to >>> that point. >> >> And I am indeed an impatient person so will continue fiddling. I have a >> couple of spare controller IC's, and all show same behaviour, so at least >> that can be ruled out. >> >> cheers, Rob >> >> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-02-13 20:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.