last thing, lines starting with a red box is what i miss, green is double checked and matches in all 3 places orange is where i found a substitute 2017-02-14 21:37 GMT+01:00 Mike Stein <mhs.stein@gmail.com>: > I've lost track; which board are we talking about? > > m > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com> > *To:* cbm-hackers@musoftware.de > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 14, 2017 3:34 PM > *Subject:* Re: Is it at all possible? > > double checking stuff and for the resistors i found these odd's: > > Ruud's schematic lists R5 as 1.5 Kohm but the BOM in the service manual > says 560 ohm > R8 is a 1Kohm but BOM says 390 Ohm > R10 is a 100 ohm but on BOM its a 120 ohm > R31 is a 1Kohm but BOM says 180 ohm > R37 is a 47Kohm but on BOM its 2,7Kohm > > R46 is on BOM but not on Ruud's schematic > The following is on Ruud's schematic but not on BOM: R42, R36, R50, R48, > R49 > > will go on and recheck capacitors > > 2017-02-14 20:58 GMT+01:00 Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>: > >> >> - there are a few BOM's in the service manual at zimmers, i used the >> first one but maybe that is not the right one? >> >> I can answer this one myself... the schematic has only the 5 pin video so >> its the first one board in the service manual. PCB 326298-01 Schematic >> 326106 >> >> 2017-02-14 20:35 GMT+01:00 Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>: >> >>> a bit back to the org subject >>> >>> BOM: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Gl0Q71u6fKLPRA9HQiSG >>> 8-xY8tPweMwXuy_UGQ1Iayo/edit?usp=sharing >>> Schematic: http://www.baltissen.org/images/c64.png >>> >>> Best photo of a board so far: http://myoldcomputer.nl/w >>> p-content/uploads/2015/11/board-326298.jpg >>> >>> I have got most of the discrete stuff sourced, thou i have a few >>> capcacitors i could not figure >>> >>> Q's: >>> >>> >>> - is mica and ceramic the same thing? i ask because i could not find >>> a few of the ceramics but could find them as mica's >>> - C106 is not on the BOM on page 22 in this PDF: >>> http://www.zimmers.net/anonftp/pub/cbm/schematics/compu >>> ters/c64/servicemanuals/C64_Service_Manual_314001-02_(1985_ >>> Feb)%20.pdf >>> <http://www.zimmers.net/anonftp/pub/cbm/schematics/computers/c64/servicemanuals/C64_Service_Manual_314001-02_(1985_Feb)%20.pdf> >>> - but on the scematic on page 26 it is marked as 150pf but with a >>> dashed box arround it. I looked at the board i just linked and could not >>> find it anywhere. But can i assume that its just a ceramic? >>> - The socket for the expansion port is also a no go so far, anyone >>> know a shop that has them regular? >>> - L4 is listed as a line filter of some sorts, but could not find >>> any more info so far, anyone knows more about it? >>> - RP4 anyone know what kind it is? BOM at the zimmers link says 10 >>> pin so can it be assumed that its 5 individual resistors? >>> >>> Things noted on the schematic from Ruud >>> >>> >>> - Only one of the resistors in RP4 is connected on both sides, do i >>> miss something here? >>> - Same for RP3 >>> - there are a few BOM's in the service manual at zimmers, i used the >>> first one but maybe that is not the right one? >>> >>> >>> Will do the chips tomorrow, rest of evening will be spent double >>> checking and look a bit more in the service manual >>> >>> >>> 2017-02-14 8:29 GMT+01:00 Julian Perry <jp@digitaltapestries.com>: >>> >>>> Hello GJPAA, >>>> >>>> Tuesday, February 14, 2017, 6:01:26 PM, you wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *> Hallo Bo,>> First of all i wonder what board rev matches this >>>> schematic?> I have no idea. The source is the schematic in the well known >>>> Programmers Reference Guide.*As Hans has mentioned, it looks very, >>>> very close to Rev 250407. Nothing was ever absolute with Commodore boards, >>>> but I think that's as close as you'll get. Commodore were always tinkering >>>> with the analog video and audio (particularly early on) so there may be >>>> some differences there. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *>> and if there are a high res scan "out there" i could use for >>>> initial component placement> Write me in private and I will generate a PNG >>>> with an higher> resolution. Or you can have the original files. Eagle can >>>> be> downloaded and you can create your PNG. And you can tinker with the SCH >>>> yourself.>> Next would part are ABSOLUTE not to be found no where? > These >>>> parts aren't that rare. Just ask around.>> and board layout> Hasn't that be >>>> done already? Several people have asked for the SCH before.*There was >>>> the C64 reloaded a short while back ( http://wiki.icomp.de/wiki/C64_ >>>> reloaded ). Aside from cleaner video output I didn't quite see the >>>> point: but it's always nice to see the C64 candle burning bright !! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *> Hmmm, next thought: what about using the ATX format? >> Next, how >>>> much use would the work be in general?> Depends on your skills and >>>> experience.> Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards,> Ruud Baltissen*> >>>> www.Baltissen.org <http://www.Baltissen.org> >>>> <jp@digitaltapestries.com> >>>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >>> >>> >>> >> > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-02-14 21:01:59
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.