@Silver When you come by the 326298 please let me know. Will try and compile at list of what i need to have checked @anyone... let me know if there are a c64 for sale with the 326298 inside. Initial it does not have to be in working order. I am after the bare board first time arround 2017-02-17 19:42 GMT+01:00 <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl>: > > > On 2017-02-17, at 18:12, Francesco Messineo < > francesco.messineo@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> As far as I know, the 326298 is older than the KU-14194HB. > >>> > >>> > >>> yes, but should be practically identical, not that I witnessed them in > >>> real life, but I've never found any documented schematic change > >>> between them. > >> > >> > >> The layout is quite different, especially on the right side of the PCB: > >> > >> KU: http://myoldcomputer.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/KU-14194HB.jpg > >> > >> 326298: http://www.cbmhardware.de/c64/images/326298a.jpg > >> > > > > you're so right! > > I am yet to find a single Gerrit's statements where he is not ;-) > > BTW - all the boards in one place are listed/shown on my ROM replacement > page: > > http://e4aws.silverdr.com/projects/romrep/ > > Except the Yeti... I mean the 250441... Has anyone seen that one? > > > I'm missing three revisions then (and both the two older ones won't be > > coming as far as I can dream). > > I should have the 326298 somewhere but as for KU-board, well.. we are on > the same boat. > > -- > SD! > > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-02-17 20:02:07
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.