Re: Is it at all possible?

From: Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 23:13:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFqpYu7Nv6Dn5uaAcJzx_qyHSJr2d5qoC73UPX2EwAaAJErnvw@mail.gmail.com>
would it be pushing it using a scanner for that?

benefits are able to get better image...

does the board look the same as this:
http://myoldcomputer.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/board-326298.jpg

but i need details arround RP4 and L4



2017-02-17 23:07 GMT+01:00 Santo Nucifora <santo.nucifora@gmail.com>:

> I have a C64 326298 board in front of me.  It's not for sale but I'm happy
> to take detailed pics if you need them.
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> also C48 and C93 is missing
>>
>> 2017-02-17 22:24 GMT+01:00 Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> @Ruud
>>>
>>> Found some errors in your schematic
>>>
>>> U31 pin 16 is missing
>>> C68 is missing
>>>
>>> 2017-02-17 21:37 GMT+01:00 Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> @Silver no problemo... its no rush. I'm still getting my head to absorb
>>>> the schematic from the Programmer's Reference Guide and schematic #326106.
>>>> There are a few differences allready between the 2 and so far i have just
>>>> put a circle arround them
>>>>
>>>> But so far RP4 and L4 is the mystery bits. L4 is just listed as a line
>>>> filter with no values at all or any mfg code. all i know is that its 2
>>>> inductors in one unit
>>>>
>>>> RP4 is a resistor pack with one common pin, but given its listed as a
>>>> 10 pin device there are 9 resistors inside, but i can only count 8 on the
>>>> schematic so i guess 1 is unused.
>>>>
>>>> 2017-02-17 21:23 GMT+01:00 <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl>:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > On 2017-02-17, at 20:55, Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > @Silver
>>>>> >
>>>>> > When you come by the 326298 please let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> As I wrote, I should have one somewhere. The keyword here is
>>>>> "somewhere". So I might have a quick look but if it's not easily found then
>>>>> I won't be able to dedicate enough time to dig it out. And - obviously - it
>>>>> won't be for sale but I might check a thing or two for you if needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW. Some time ago I had a short discussion about VIC-20 boards here.
>>>>> I don't remember know exactly with whom but if the person who wanted me to
>>>>> check things on those boards reads the list - please come back with your
>>>>> question again. Seems that I managed to gather /I think/ all my VIC-20s
>>>>> under one roof so I can check whatever you wanted to check there.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> SD!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>        Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-02-17 23:00:21

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.