thanks... off to bed but can you says if any of the pins from rp4 is not connecting to anything? hmmm.... L4... there are a dashed line around it on the schematic, maybe that means not mounted or something... 2017-02-18 0:09 GMT+01:00 Santo Nucifora <santo.nucifora@gmail.com>: > Pics of L5 and RP4 on both boards. Sorry, glare is present because of > lighting. > > http://vintagecomputer.ca/commodore-64-pics-326298-motherboards/ > > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> L5 i see also on the pic... between the switch and power input right? >> >> 2017-02-17 23:37 GMT+01:00 Santo Nucifora <santo.nucifora@gmail.com>: >> >>> I only see an L5. Can't see any other L's actually. That goes for both. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Bo Herrmannsen < >>> bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> L4 is proberly located in the very corner next to the slot and power in >>>> >>>> on some boards the are below the slot >>>> >>>> but on revC i just figured that we just have 2 equal inductors on the >>>> came core... red and green wire on the link i posted >>>> >>>> 2017-02-17 23:31 GMT+01:00 Santo Nucifora <santo.nucifora@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> A camera actually works better than a scanner. I can take some pics >>>>> tomorrow with better daylight. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, that's where I read Rev A vs Rev C :) >>>>> >>>>> I can find RP4 (resistor pack bear the cartridge slot. Where is L4? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Bo Herrmannsen < >>>>> bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> nope that does not make sense either >>>>>> >>>>>> so you are not the only one that dont get date vs rev >>>>>> >>>>>> in the link i posted i can see rev C very faint at the bottom edge in >>>>>> the middle >>>>>> >>>>>> just under the component FB10 and next to C93 >>>>>> >>>>>> 2017-02-17 23:20 GMT+01:00 Santo Nucifora <santo.nucifora@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not sure where to look. Chip dates are: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 326298 Rev A - 6502 date: Week 48 82 >>>>>>> - 326298 Rev C - 6502 date: Week 29 82 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I still don't get Commodore dates vs revisions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Bo Herrmannsen < >>>>>>> bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you see any production dates on the Rev A and Rev C ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2017-02-17 23:14 GMT+01:00 Santo Nucifora <santo.nucifora@gmail.com >>>>>>>> >: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Slight change to my last message. I have two boards plus a couple >>>>>>>>> of extra C64 Silver labels that I don't know what's inside at this point. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The open ones have: >>>>>>>>> - 326298 Rev A >>>>>>>>> - 326298 Rev C >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That picture is a Rev C. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Bo Herrmannsen < >>>>>>>>> bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> would it be pushing it using a scanner for that? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> benefits are able to get better image... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> does the board look the same as this: http://myoldcomputer.nl/ >>>>>>>>>> wp-content/uploads/2015/11/board-326298.jpg >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> but i need details arround RP4 and L4 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-17 23:07 GMT+01:00 Santo Nucifora < >>>>>>>>>> santo.nucifora@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have a C64 326298 board in front of me. It's not for sale but >>>>>>>>>>> I'm happy to take detailed pics if you need them. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Bo Herrmannsen < >>>>>>>>>>> bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> also C48 and C93 is missing >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-17 22:24 GMT+01:00 Bo Herrmannsen < >>>>>>>>>>>> bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> @Ruud >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Found some errors in your schematic >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> U31 pin 16 is missing >>>>>>>>>>>>> C68 is missing >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-17 21:37 GMT+01:00 Bo Herrmannsen < >>>>>>>>>>>>> bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Silver no problemo... its no rush. I'm still getting my head >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to absorb the schematic from the Programmer's Reference Guide and schematic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> #326106. There are a few differences allready between the 2 and so far i >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have just put a circle arround them >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But so far RP4 and L4 is the mystery bits. L4 is just listed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a line filter with no values at all or any mfg code. all i know is that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> its 2 inductors in one unit >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> RP4 is a resistor pack with one common pin, but given its >>>>>>>>>>>>>> listed as a 10 pin device there are 9 resistors inside, but i can only >>>>>>>>>>>>>> count 8 on the schematic so i guess 1 is unused. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-17 21:23 GMT+01:00 <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On 2017-02-17, at 20:55, Bo Herrmannsen < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @Silver >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > When you come by the 326298 please let me know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I wrote, I should have one somewhere. The keyword here is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "somewhere". So I might have a quick look but if it's not easily found then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I won't be able to dedicate enough time to dig it out. And - obviously - it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be for sale but I might check a thing or two for you if needed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW. Some time ago I had a short discussion about VIC-20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> boards here. I don't remember know exactly with whom but if the person who >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wanted me to check things on those boards reads the list - please come back >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with your question again. Seems that I managed to gather /I think/ all my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VIC-20s under one roof so I can check whatever you wanted to check there. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SD! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-02-18 00:00:19
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.