Re: Is it at all possible?

From: Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:29:13 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFqpYu689b9XQi78CK4wfXcSeeqTwcWvuvWA=mkX-0eFhoQTpg@mail.gmail.com>
https://github.com/boelle/C64-Schematics-Boards/tree/master/From%20Programmer's%20Reference%20Guide

Eagle schematic should now be 99,99% the same as in the Programmer's
Reference Guide which if not mistaken is also what Rev A boards are made
from

There is also a txt with a link to the Google Sheet that holds the BOM.
Lines in RED are what i need to source.

3 pdf's there also, 2 are the schematics from Programmer's Reference Guide
and the last is the Programmer's Reference Guide itself it in its complete
form

A photo of the board sent to be by Santo, i will initial use this as a
template to make a replica of the Rev a board. in eagle i will simply
import the photo and place components on top of that. for the tracks i will
need a scrap board thou where i can remove all components so nothing is
hidden



2017-02-19 0:26 GMT+01:00 Mike Stein <mhs.stein@gmail.com>:

> Sounds like it's really well covered ;-)
>
> FWIW, the three boards I found at a fast look through the pile are also
> all Rev A.
>
> m
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Nick Vivid <nickvivid@gmail.com>
> *To:* cbm-hackers@musoftware.de
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 18, 2017 5:38 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Is it at all possible?
>
> I have 2 326298 rev a boards I don't mind hacking apart and taking
> pictures of in the name of science. Let me know if you guys need anything.
>
>
>
> On Feb 18, 2017 3:45 PM, "Bo Herrmannsen" <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> YES
>
> that pic helped me solve the dammn RP4 mystery..
>
> on the schematic R51 should have been labeled RP4...
>
> it connects to pin 4 of the expansion port which on the pic goes to Rp4
>
>
>
> 2017-02-18 20:39 GMT+01:00 Santo Nucifora <santo.nucifora@gmail.com>:
>
>> I added head-on pics of the 326298 Rev A and C boards. Sadly, the back
>> has a metal shield soldered onto both boards that will be difficult to
>> remove and I'd like to keep these as working boards so front pics only.
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Gerrit Heitsch <
>> gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/18/2017 08:15 PM, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2017-02-18, at 09:36, smf <smf@null.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "The sweet spot is a 250466 board
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Precisely…
>>>>
>>>> The VIC chip on those boards is a R5, which gives the clearest picture.
>>>>> "
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> Not quite... You can get a clear picture from a 6569R1, 6569R3 or 6569R4
>>> (that one is rather rare) as well. The problem on the older boards is
>>> mostly the modulator. Replace it with a simple video amp and you will have
>>> a very good picture. Ok, you lose the RF output, but who is using that
>>> anymore?
>>>
>>>
>>> It also has the 8 pin video port, not 5 pin like the earlier ones.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Which is also not fully correct. Should read "like some of the earlier
>>>> ones". Not all earlier boards had 5-pin A/V socket.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Even the old KU board already has the 8pin Video out.
>>>
>>>  Gerrit
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-02-19 12:01:42

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.