On 19/02/2017 19:55, Gerrit Heitsch wrote: > No, they weren't. They were 6567R7 or higher and the people who > grabbed them were using the 6567R56A which produced a lot of things, > but not a nice picture. Ah, I noticed where I was going wrong. I don't care about 6567 as it's NTSC, I'm all about the 6569. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-02-19 20:04:54
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.