Twitterizing a mailing list doesn't help with signal to noise ratio either IMHO André Am 20. Februar 2017 3:11:18 PM schrieb Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>: > Well i tried to reduce noise in another thread :-D > > Sadly i'm not good at magic so the noise just turned up somewhere else :-/ > > 2017-02-20 15:09 GMT+01:00 <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl>: > >> While you certainly added noise, I believe you forgot to add any signal to >> those reposted messages, didn't you? >> >> > On 2017-02-20, at 13:34, Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > 2017-02-20 13:32 GMT+01:00 smf <smf@null.net>: >> > On 20/02/2017 10:41, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote: >> > The "dust" he writes about applies to my understanding only to the >> "modern plasma TV" he used and which I expect does bad job handling off >> specs signals. >> > >> > Old tv's are blurry and uses anlogue processing. Plasma TV's have >> crisper pixels & depending on the TV and how it's setup could have less >> than 8 bits of colour resolution per channel. This makes irregularities in >> the video signal more visible, which is especially worse if the plasma TV >> has a much larger screen size. >> > >> > VCD and DVB suffer from the same problem as they were developed to be >> satisfactory with old tv's. >> > >> > >> > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >> > >> >> -- >> SD! >> >> >> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-02-20 15:01:52
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.