Re: trying to identify a rom...

From: Francesco Messineo <francesco.messineo_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 21:44:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAESs-_wD1rCfTLQY+JOe_fOy4=35jT8eX0G3Z4-JMDWA5WiYLw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:34 PM, didier derny <didier@aida.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I tried to read it as a 2532  I get 2k of FF and 2k of real code (visibly
> 6502 opcodes)

it might be a 2716 then. Or have a broken address line. If it reads
real code when A11 is low, then it's more likely a 2K ROM (A11 pin on
the 2532 is an output enable active low on the 2716).
If it reads real code with A11 high, I would suspect a partial failure.

>
> but I tought it was a 4k eprom
>
>
> On 18/05/2017 21:21, Francesco Messineo wrote:
>>
>> If it was on a PET, it's either readable as 2532 or (much less probable) a
>> 2716.
>> Frank
>>
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:56 PM, didier derny <didier@aida.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> there are no other marking on the top
>>>
>>> on the bottom there is a number: 41203  made with some ink
>>>
>>> I know roughly what is in this eprom but I'm not sure about the machine
>>> nor
>>> the rom type
>>>
>>> its a basic extension  but never seen this version 2.0 is probably the
>>> version of the basic with which it was used
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17/05/2017 22:21, Francesco Messineo wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:16 PM, didier derny <didier@aida.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to identifiy an eprom type to try to read it
>>>>>
>>>>> the rom is made by mos technology
>>>>>
>>>>> 24 pin
>>>>>
>>>>> datecode: 3680   (the 4000/8000 were not  sold at this time ?)
>>>>>
>>>>> label:  Edex 2.0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> my wild guess is to say it was for the commodore 3000  not found the
>>>>> schematics I guess it's equivalent to 2001N
>>>>>
>>>>> on the schematics  I found rom  6332  any datasheet any where ?
>>>>>
>>>>> what differences between a 2332 and a 6332  ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've never heard about 6332. 2332 is the classic 4k ROM, pin
>>>> compatible with 2532 EPROM type (NOT 2732).
>>>> Is there anything else under the label? There must be a part number too.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Frank IZ8DWF
>>>>
>>>>          Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>
>>         Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>
>
>
>       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-05-18 20:02:28

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.