Re: Disassembler preference?

From: Steve Gray <*sjgray_at_rogers.com*> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1745952519.1869205.1498830817058@mail.yahoo.com> · sjgray_at_rogers.com

I was going to agree with Ruud... I also prefer "my" disassembler ;-)
It's part of CBM-Transfer. It's an interactive symbolic disassembler with code tracing and pre-defined platforms. It supports opcodes for most 6502 variations. You can import regenerator files as well.  Source is available and I am actively working on it.
Steve

      From: "silverdr@wfmh.org.pl" <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl>
 To: cbm-hackers@musoftware.de 
 Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 6:37 AM
 Subject: Re: Disassembler preference?

> On 2017-06-30, at 07:24, Ruud@Baltissen.org wrote:
> 
> Hallo Patryk,
> 
>> ... so would like to ask you for your favourites in this area.
> 
> My own AD, Auto Disassembler, off course :)

Yeah - want to have it done right? Do it yourself! :-)

> - written in Free Pascal, compiles under Linux as well.
> - sources are free
> - disassembles Z80 and 6800 a well
> - using a directive file you can give variabels and subroutines the 
> correct name right from the start

Let's have a look. Can I get the sources to try to compile them here?

-- 
SD! - http://e4aws.silverdr.com/

      Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list