Re: The Ultimate-64

From: silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:34:17 +0200
Message-Id: <4FF1D7C9-FBF1-4A12-A55D-E551D9B8D2E8@wfmh.org.pl>
> On 2017-07-17, at 16:58, smf <smf@null.net> wrote:
> 
> On 17/07/2017 14:08, Gerrit Heitsch wrote:
>> The user port is there, just not as an edge connector but on a pin header.
> 
> I read that, but it doesn't help me plug a user port cable in. If it came with a cable that goes to a user port edge connector then it wouldn't be as bad.

I understand his choice and this was one of the things I also suggested. This is a compromise. I don't want to be left without the USER PORT facility but I understand that the connectors he placed in the opening will be statistically more often used. So this is a compromise I can live with and build my own cables accordingly. Obviously - if you are interested - designing an adapter is practically trivial so if people are interested I can pull off one in an evening or so. So does he I am sure, and it might appear later as an add-on if enough people show interest.

-- 
SD! - http://e4aws.silverdr.com/


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-07-17 16:01:08

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.