Am Mittwoch, 23. August 2017, 10:03:27 CEST schrieben Sie: > > Another thing: so far I program in Free Pascal for non-DOS applications > > like my (dis)assemblers. I have tried several times to switch to C. But > > what put me off so far several times was that if I wrote a program that > > would compile under compiler A, it wouldn't under compiler B or C. I have > > seen the huge list of available C compilers for Linux so the first idea > > is just to stick to the one used for compiling VICE (gcc AFAIK ?). But > > any good argument is welcome! i find that an interesting statement from someone who uses pascal compilers :) if you stick to writing standard C, then really, pretty much any "big" compiler made in the last decades would do the trick. even cc65 is pretty standard compliant by now :) -- http://www.hitmen-console.org http://magicdisk.untergrund.net http://www.pokefinder.org http://ar.pokefinder.org Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. <Arthur C. Clarke> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-08-24 20:03:32
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.