Hello! smf wrote: > In GWBASIC it's SYSTEM, I don't know if MSBASIC is the same. Yes! Thank you. > I believe the 6502 and x86 code are entirely seperate and apart from > them both being basic interpreters, they have nothing really in common. You're right. I downloaded the manual from: http://www.retroarchive.org/cpm/lang/lang.htm It seems the language is much more powerful (which should not be surprising, given the executable is over 40 kB versus 8 kB in the Commodore). In fact, the manual has this little paragraph at point D.7.2 "To return to CP/M, use the SYSTEM command". I would have never found it myself, it is hidden so well - I discovered it only retroactively looking for "SYSTEM" in the index. > You may want to get cbmbasic from http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48 running > on MSDOS 1.25 instead. Now only if I got a C compiler for MS-DOS 1.25... ;-) Regards. Michau. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-10-07 16:00:02
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.