On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:53 PM, william degnan <billdegnan@gmail.com> wrote: > what would really be smooth if you could switch back and forth between 3040 > and 4040 modes. I can do that, I've designed 2332/2364 compatible replacements using 28C64 EEPROMs, so with a little PCB change, I can put two images on each 2332 replacement and use a common address to select "upper" or "lower" images. The 6530 Internal/External ROM change could be selected with the same signal, by adding some simple logic. I think I would need an external switch to select the ROMs anyway. > b > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:51 AM, william degnan <billdegnan@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> that is my understanding. >> b >> >> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Francesco Messineo >> <francesco.messineo@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:17 PM, william degnan <billdegnan@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Yes. There was an upgrade kit. If you can find the chips or steal >>> > them >>> > from a 4040 drive here is what I found: >>> > >>> > Replace the 6530 with the CBM chip 901466-04 >>> > UL1 gets a 901468-12 >>> > UJ1 gets a 901468-11 (take from 4040 UK1) >>> > UH1 gets a 901468-13 >>> >>> ok, the last three chips can be 2532 EPROMs with the right content, no >>> problems here. >>> Looking at the schematics, it seems that the 6530's ROM is selected by >>> /RS0 only, so in theory, I could >>> make an adapter to tie /RS0 of the original 6530 high, and use the >>> select signal to enable another external EPROM for the new >>> code. The rest of the 6530 should continue to work as expected, am I >>> right? >>> >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > You'll have to convert the 2040-formatted disks to 4040 format to read >>> > them. >>> > The 2040/3040 will with the upgrade act like a 4040 drive. >>> > >>> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Francesco Messineo >>> > <francesco.messineo@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi all, >>> >> just a quick question for the experts: Is it possible to upgrade a >>> >> 3040 dual drive to DOS2.1 (like a 4040)? >>> >> Thanks >>> >> >>> >> Frank >>> >> >>> >> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >>> > >>> > >>> >>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >> >> > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-11-13 17:03:04
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.