On 11/15/2017 02:16 PM, smf wrote: > On 15/11/2017 11:48, Gerrit Heitsch wrote: >> Illegal Opcodes were never guaranteed. If you want those to work, you >> have to stick to 6502 from MOS, everyone else might have made small >> changes to the mask or the process which caused some illegal opcodes >> to behave differently. > > In terms of the second source suppliers, I believe they were under > contractual obligation to produce exactly what MOS told them & if there > are variances then you'll see them in MOS chips too. Does this still apply to chips made after CSG/MOS went out of business? Also, I have doubts about the later 6502 still being NMOS. Gerrit Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-11-15 14:02:48
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.