Re: Moving BAM to a different track

From: Michał Pleban <lists_at_michau.name>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:53:14 +0100
Message-ID: <5A20296A.5010607@michau.name>
silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote:

> Sounds like being the most viable approach in the long run.

I suppose so, because this way I get 29 more sectors instead of just
4... and 29 sectors should be enough for anyone, right?

The important question is now - if the track 38 is filled, does the 8050
place new files on track 37 or on track 40?

Regards,
Michau.

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-11-30 16:05:00

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.