On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 08:50:17AM +0100, smf wrote: >On 05/06/2018 08:22, Marko Mäkelä wrote: >>I believe that CMD must have made some kind of licensing agreement >>with Commodore, with some conditions. >> >I believe they had a license, but if there were conditions then why >did CMD willfully violate those conditions when they sold bulk >licenses of JiffyDOS licences (not JiffyDOS 1541 product) to the clone >drive manufacturers knowing that CBM had sued them and were capable of >finding them out? > >Conditions may have been imposed afterwards, but then why did the >drives remain on sale? They were advertised in all of the UK magazines >for years. Yeah, even I got an Oceanic OC-118N that I think has JiffyDOS on board. I vaguely remember that some address or data lines may have been shuffled. It is a great drive; in my opinion better than Commodore's (even counting the 1541-II). A compact design with off-the-shelf 74 series chips. I got my drive for free after submitting something to a Finnish magazine's coding contest. That must have been in the early 1990s. A funny detail is that the drive was originally shipped with a 110V power adapter (US plug). MarkoReceived on 2018-06-05 18:00:05
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.