On 8/5/2018 12:29 PM, Mia Magnusson wrote: > > I wounder how hard it would be to change the rom to use PB4 instead of > PB0 for ATN ack (and therefore also move another signal as all pins are > used)? Well, in my design, it's trivial, as it is merely: assign ieee_bus_ack = b[4]; instead of assign ieee_bus_ack = b[0]; But, the ROM code needs to be altered as well (I know, Mr. Obvious, but for the rest of the folks) > > PB4 is the pin used for ATN ack on a 1541 and in 1541 mode the pinout > needs to be the default for all turbo loaders, copy protection stuff > and similar to work. But I don't know of any copy protection or "turbo > load" software for 2031LP, so there might not be any incompatibles. > > By swapping PB4 and PB0 the same ATN trap circuit could be used both in > serial and in IEEE-488 mode. Hmm, not really, as I will be implementing the trap circuit in the CPLD for the IEEE side, so I wouldn't care about the IEC ATN trap circuit. > > > For someone ordering a bunch and > selling a bunch of ready made conversion kits, like Jim seems to be > planning, this might not be a problem. But for everyone who like me > would rather just build a one-off thing it would be nice to be able to > use whatever is more easily obtained or even something that usually > already exists in an electronics hobby component box. Well, Digikey has both in stock. Farnell or other EU sellers don't? > > It seems like the 74AC/ACT family can sink/source 24mA, while the > 75160/75161 can sink/source 48mA. I'd look at ABT and ABTH, which can source/sink the right amount. But, the '245 transceivers, which seems a reasonable fit, are more expensive than the 75160/161. Your point on unpowered loading still applies, no doubt. JimReceived on 2018-08-05 21:00:04
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.