Re: 65C02 assembler / trace

From: André Fachat <afachat_at_gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:24:53 +0200
Message-ID: <16629948c08.27e0.b4d1f2b66006003a6acd9b1a7b71c3b1@gmx.de>
Am 30. September 2018 7:59:44 AM schrieb didier derny <didier@aida.org>:

> no idea,  I used CA65 once I had to make a lot of modifications in the
> source code
> I never used XA65
>
> I don't like assemblers using H or 0x like assembler for Z80
> assemblers using non standard code in place of  <  and >  to extract the
> low part or high part
> or the assemblers needing a lot of declarations

Maybe then try xa65. I explicitly wrote it to understand "BASIC" listings 
with "old style" assembler code, i.e. with (optional) line numbers, $ hex 
values, and <> for lower/upper part of a word if that is all. You can even 
have multiple statements in one line separated by colon, like in BASIC...

André
Received on 2018-09-30 11:00:06

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.