Re: did anyone actually try this MPS6550?

From: silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 20:18:43 +0100
Message-Id: <72502998-8AAF-4CB1-867B-067B9AB5755E@wfmh.org.pl>
> On 2018-12-29, at 19:47, Francesco Messineo <francesco.messineo@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> when I write "counterfeit" I mean really different parts, not
> "cleaned" pulls or something similar that can work in place of the
> original part.

I understand. Just to me they are all counterfeit. I can't be sure whether the part is actually what the painted markings make it claim to be. If I get a 6502 that is marked "MOS", I'd like to know that this is actually the "MOS" 6502 without running lengthy tests just to find out if it is "compatible enough". I also would not have anything against buying pulls, provided they are honestly sold as pulls (even cleaned ones) and not sanded / painted-over to sell as NOS.

> In the case I've cited, the received mosfets had
> different pinout (D-G swapped) and very different characteristics
> also, gate capacitance was 20-30 times the original one, so turn-on
> and off times were way off. Channel on-resistance also was
> different... so unusable in place of the originals (even if one
> dreamed of adapting the pinout on a 30 MHz amplifier...).
> I wouldn't mean testing my luck on 40-years-old NOS parts, but if
> they're something different with just a part number added on the case,
> then there's no point in risking.

I was lucky so far not to get those "completely counterfeit" ones but even in case of fake NOS stuff I immediately request either full or partial (in case of stuff that most probably is what it claims to be, just not unused) refund. I think only once I didn't It took me too long to check what actually came..

-- 
SD! - https://e4aws.silverdr.com/
Received on 2018-12-29 21:01:01

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.