Re: Did Commodore cheat with the quad density floppies?

From: Thom Cherryhomes <thom.cherryhomes_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:22:07 -0600
Message-ID: <CAPQyuQK5tJn7CjBaUmMU8ALMAM4eJJgCOQ8ZBtKAGUv=M3t0Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Yeah, the drives in the IBM 5150/5160 were standard Tandon TM100-1 or -2A
(single or double sided), with IBM's logo stamped on them.

The PCJr used a Qumetrak 142 with IBM's logo stamped on them.

Oddly enough, they stopped doing this with the IBM 5170...
-Thom

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 12:16 PM William Levak <wlevak@sdf.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Jan 2019, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote:
>
> > Again - the same story as some time ago - IBM did NOT take "off-the
> shelf"
>    drives as you like to tell the world. They ordered custom (IBM) branded
>    ones. Only the custom injection moulds cost probably more than the whole
>    thing we talk about here. Off-the-shelf story of CRippled hardware was a
>    result, not cause of what IBM did.
>
> The IBM drives were identical to ones available from other sources, except
> the IBM logo. I am absolutely sure of this because I was putting together
> systems back then and I bought the same drives without the IBM logo, at
> half the price. As far as the cost of the IBM logo, it was a common
> practice for the manufacturer to put your logo on them at no extra cost,
> if you put in a big enough order.
>
> wlevak@sdf.lonestar.org
> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
>
>
Received on 2019-01-08 20:03:39

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.