On 1/9/19 12:49 PM, groepaz@gmx.net wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2019, 12:45:05 CET schrieb Gerrit Heitsch: >> On 1/9/19 12:08 PM, Francesco Messineo wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 12:02 PM <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl> wrote: >>>>> On 2019-01-09, at 11:43, Francesco Messineo > <francesco.messineo@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> At least IEC still allows more than two devices ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> But no, the IEC on the C64 is another example of CR(ippled) hardware, >>>>>> plus VIA-bug workaround ridden implementation. Its big brother GPIB, >>>>>> while predating both, wasn't bad though.>>> >>>>> Yes it was slow, but I couldn't think about a better compromise, >>>>> really. >>>> >>>> The major issue was actually the speed - not really of the bus but of the >>>> 1541 implementation with 6522 software workarounds making the bus look >>>> worse than it really was. Common thing was to add at least the parallel >>>> connection to 1541, bringing it somewhat closer to the original GPIB. >>>> And yes - it still allowed more than two devices and obviously not only >>>> the floppy drives.> >>> Yes, that was due to a bug in the 6522 chip. And sure, one of the >>> first things that I purchased when I could, was the speeddos mod, >>> even if I needed to go back to plain IEC speed whenever I wanted to >>> plug the super-fast 300 bps user port modem :) >> >> From what I read, Commodore had planned to do a rework of the 1541 >> using a 6526 (probably like in the 1570/71, or just replacing one 6522 >> with a 6526), but someone deleted the necessary traces to use the shift >> register from the C64 schematics and when that was found, they already >> had a lot of boards produced. So they dropped the rework of the drive >> and went with bit banging I/O. And they even had to slow that down >> compared to the VIC-20 due to the badlines VIC-II introduced. >> >> I would really be interested in what would be necessary to get a C64 to >> what was initially planned. > > http://a1bert.kapsi.fi/Dev/burst/ - VICE emulates this, and the C64RMK2 can do > it too Ok, I wrote it in a way that is easy to misunderstand... This would also include what would need to be done to a 1541 to change it. Would it be possile to replace one of the 6522 with a 6526 plus some software adjustments or would you have to add a 6526? GerritReceived on 2019-01-09 13:02:43
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.