On 10/07/2019 19:32, laughton_at_cyg.net wrote: > Sorry to tease everyone -- it was the '816 I was thinking of. My > notion was to run it in parallel with the 6510, not to replace it. In > other words, the '816 address bus etc would connect to nothing, but > during reads (code fetches) its data bus would have the 6510 data bus > copied to it. Then the oh-so-convenient VPA/VDA signals will reveal > when the opcode fetches occur. The 65816 can't even run all c64 code, let alone cycle exact. If you're going to use a 65816 then you'd be better off just using the 65816 and stop the 6510 from executing completely. You could then be on your way to designing a SuperCPU clone, which people would probably love.Received on 2020-05-29 22:30:20
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.